human judges, reviews and community ratings
When a person does the rating
How human rating differs from an algorithm, what a commissioned review actually involves, and what people are really asking for when they ask.
Latest
Saying no to the number
A one-line thanks-but-not-now keeps a judge happy to hear from you later; silence or a lecture on value closes the door for good.
-
Range has edges
A judge asked for a register outside their range does better to decline than to imitate it, because an imitated register reads as exactly that.
-
Short is sustainable
A register is hard to hold for ten minutes and easy to hold for two, so judges gravitate to short clips not out of laziness but because short is where the work is best.
-
Asking for bluntness
Requesting a blunt read is fine and judges respect it; reacting badly to the answer you asked for is where the rudeness happens.
-
Two registers in one clip
A clip that opens playful and lands honest, or teases before it reassures, is a real thing judges do well; a clip asked to be everything at once is not.
-
The first five seconds
The opening of a clip sets the register, signals the persona and tells the buyer they were expected, and judges spend disproportionate care on it.
-
A crowd and a professional are different instruments
Free community rating threads give volume and noise; a commissioned judge gives one considered response, and people confuse the two constantly.